Strong +1. This is an obvious, useful, rational and alas, strictly irrelevant point. Which I agree with.
-G On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:51 PM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Oct 1, 2015, at 10:45 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> Uh, no. The *only* loopback address is ::1. The rest of 0000::/8 is > reserved. > >> > >> Anything is a loopback address if you alias it on your loopback > interface. > >> > >> ::2 was only intended as an example (that's why I said "salt to taste"), > >> but it was not a particularly well-chosen one. > > > > On your system, I'm sure it works fine. On other systems that > > implement IPv6 in other ways, maybe not. > > Which is why I think > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00 > > should be resurrected (not directly relevant to DNSOP of course). > > Regards, > -drc > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
