On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:09:38PM +0100, sara <[email protected]> wrote a message of 107 lines which said:
> So under normal circumstances matching on just the Message ID should > be sufficient for TCP, which was the reason the QCLASS+QNAME+QTYPE > part was removed when changing the ‘must' here to ‘MUST' in the last > revision of this draft. OK, but why adding the port number, useless for TCP? > However it is true that requiring matching on all the fields would > be more consistent And more robust, if the client is stupid enough to re-use Query IDs. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
