\o/ -G
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Shane Kerr <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > At BII we have been working on a couple of drafts that might be of > interest to the dnsop working group. We are happy to work them through > as independent submissions, but if there is interest in the working > group then we are also happy to do the work here. > > Sorry we don't have the drafts submitted yet. :( But here is a rough > idea about them. > > We have one document that is a kind of survey document of DNS over > HTTP. We go through the whole taxonomy of DNS over HTTP, starting from > DNS just using port 80 instead of port 53, through various levels of > encapsulation, and finally ending up with REST-style API's at the very > end. > > The other document describes our specific implementation, which sits > kind of in the middle of the the previous document, using DNS packets > sent in wire format via application/octet-stream. While of less general > interest, probably this is more important to standardize for > interoperability reasons. > > Anyway, I am sure the quality of any resulting RFCs will be higher if > the working group adopts them, but I this is not super important in > either case. We are happy either way. :) > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
