On 05/11/2015 11:37, Joe Abley wrote: > Hi all, > > I couldn't quite interpret the questions and hums in the room; was the > consensus > > (a) this clarification is not needed; the existing spec is clear enough, or > > (b) a clarification might be useful, but the proposed clarification in > the document is wrong, or > > (c) something else? > > If it's (b), I could collect more of the kinds of insights that were > provided at the mic and update the proposal. > > If it's (a), I can happily just shut up about and move on with other > things :-)
IMHO, if a clarification is needed, it's that a client that depends on the order of the RRsets in an answer MUST NOT do so. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
