Petr Spacek <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks again for your feedback.
> > Is the indirection problem specific to classless reverse DNS (which > > is the approach I took) or does it apply to the forward DNS as well? > > Suggestions for wording welcome. > > Personally I would mention that this problem is generic to make application > developers aware of it. In the previous exchange I was proposing text similar > to this: > > Please note that this problem is generic. For names outside of > IN-ADDR.ARPA or IP6.ARPA sub-trees it is up to implementation > to decide if it is necessary to update alias itself or if it is > necessary to update endpoint records and thus the method described > in the section 9.2 needs to be applied. > > Is there something wrong with it? It should be just informational. My fault, sorry, I missed that paragraph when I was incoporating your suggestions. I'll add this (or something similar) in the next revision. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Southeast Forties: Southwesterly 6 to gale 8, decreasing 4 or 5 later. Moderate or rough. Rain at times. Moderate or good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
