On 13/11/2015 18:00, John Levine wrote:
Over in the dbound working group we have some proposals that would use yet another underscore prefixed name to avoid name collisions. (It's not a substitute for a new RRTYPE; they need the prefix whether the data is TXT or a new type.) In the mail world we have _domainkey and _dmarc and likely others. DANE is proposing prefixes for publishing PGP and S/MIME keys. The services registry from RFC 6335 includes all the names for services, but not the prefixes for things that aren't services. How hard would it be either to update 6335 to provide for non-service names, or a new non-service registry with the understanding that it shares the 6335 FCFS namespace?
Dave Crocker previously did some work on an I-D for a (portless) service type registry - I recall he and I discussed it back at the Orlando IETF.
It would be good to see that resurrected. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
