On 22 Dec 2015, at 19:58, Paul Vixie wrote:
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:00:22 AM Tony Finch wrote:
Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, December 21, 2015 01:13:10 PM Tony Finch wrote:
The current way to deal with out-of-order responses and
head-of-line
blocking in HTTP is HTTP/2.
since http/2 is a completely new protocol, i think that's a strange
way
to say it.
Not completely - it has the same message semantics, they "just"
changed
how the messages are transported.
So another way of phrasing my previous message is that DNS-over-HTTP
ought
to be "just" a mapping from DNS messages to HTTP messages.
i agree. the only specification matter is the transform between
message formats. there's no
reason to talk about transport at all.
-1. The IETF has a decade-old rule that you cannot just say "send stuff
over HTTP" without considering the HTTP-specific semantics. If you want
this to be an IETF WG document, you have to do things the IETF way.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
