It's not really a "normal" query, in the sense that it's not coming from a stub
resolver, typically, and the initiator wouldn't normally assume that recursion
is required to fetch the answer.
So, in the typical case I'd expect RD=0.
Not sure that the "although" verbiage below really adds any value, though. If
you've already declared that something is a "MAY", what's the practical effect
of then saying that its meaning is "undefined"? Either it's allowable per the
standard or it's not.
- Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: DNSOP [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Harold
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 1:25 PM
To: IETF DNSOP WG
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-06.txt
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:32 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Section 3 says
The RD bit MAY be set to 0 or 1, although the meaning of it being set to 1 is
undefined for priming queries.
But a priming query is just a normal DNS query, so RD would be defined
normally, no?
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop