At Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:31:31 +0530, Mukund Sivaraman <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's possibly still not too late for many of these issues to be > addressed by behavioral descriptions in the draft (without any protocol > changes). I agree at least *some* of the issues have to be addressed before publication. I already agreed on some specific issues you raised before: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg16361.html You might also want to respond to the IETF last call on the draft http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg16223.html before the IESG makes their decision. (The last call period was officially over, but I believe belated feedback can be considered if it's substantial). -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
