On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (no hats) > > I think the other way to frame the use of strongly prescriptive language > in this document would be to leave the intended status at Informational, > and introduce it as an example of what some operators consider good > practice in setting up their delegations, without claiming general > applicability. > > Comments? > I definitely prefer this, because its more clear that the document intent is informative not normative, and I suspect the editorial process higher up the food chain will take cognizance of this reviewing use of language. What people do now, they may not do tomorrow. We don't constrain them unnecessarily. > > thanks, > Suzanne > cheers -George
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
