At Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:54:49 +0000, Edward Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Please no. (Ed might disagree with me on this.) I think every document > >that talks about the DNS in the IETF is about the IANA-administered DNS > >except where loudly noted. > > I very much disagree coming from operating DNS on networks other than the > global public Internet. I'm with Ed here. In my understanding RFCs of DNS related protocols generally don't make such explicit notes but are still generally used in DNS operations in closed intranet. And I think that's more sensible default interpretation. So, if a document relies on specific characteristics of the IANA-administered DNS like this draft, it's better to note that explicitly (on the other hand, I don't think we should consider draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse to be limited to the IANA-administered DNS simply because it doesn't loudly note it can be used more generally). -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
