神明達哉 wrote:
> p.s. in my understanding Unbound adopts hash-based data structure for
> cached RRsets.  If it still supports nxdomain-cut as described in
> Section 8, an argument against the proposal by referring to that type
> of implementation might sound less convincing.

My understanding is that Unbound employs at least two hash-based data
structures, one for whole messages (msg-cache-* parameters) and one for
individual RRsets (rrset-cache-* parameters).

It's also my understanding that Unbound already implements the
resimprove-00 §3 behavior when configured with "harden-below-nxdomain:
yes", but it defaults to off (only?) because "it is not an RFC".

-- 
Robert Edmonds

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to