Cheap, easy to implement, and tractable in existing systems are very attractive properties.
-G On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:33:28PM -0300, > George Michaelson <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 38 lines which said: > >> I meant a form of signing, which would be a strong signal of >> repudiation of the label as well as exclusion of other holders of >> the label, so that it could be a first-class signal "not in the DNS" >> -> look in another internet-name lookup mechanism. > > The proposal in my draft is technically trivial and easy to implement > (politically, it is another matter) because it relies only on existing > techniques. > > Your proposal is interesting but would require the development of > protocol changes and their implementation. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
