On 4/7/16 3:25 PM, David Conrad wrote: > Suzanne, > > On Apr 7, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Since we have this liaison, does anyone know if it was used to inform >>> ICANN of this discussion (it seems the right thing to do) and to ask >>> them if they wanted to comment? >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1351/ >> >> (DNSOP co-chairs, AD, and IAB collaborated on this, as the IAB has oversight >> of liaisons for the IETF.) > > Out of curiosity, since that liaison statement was made about 18 months after > RFC 6761 was published and about a 10 months after > draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names was submitted, was there any > previous liaison communication to ICANN prior to that statement related to > RFC 6761?
Afaik there's only one liason statement to icann since the inception of liason statement tracking; the basis of inter-organiation collaboration is imho largely the RFC series. > Thanks, > -drc > (speaking only for myself) > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing lis > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
