On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Shumon Huque <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've read the draft and support its adoption. Will review, etc. > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This was discussed in Buenos Aires Friday morning, but the sense we >> received from the room is that the group should move forward with this >> draft. While we like the simplicity of Warren and Geoff's cheese-shop >> draft (draft-wkumari-dnsop-cheese-shop), it is basically a simple >> proof-of-concept. The suggestion was to document the cheese-shop idea in >> this draft. >> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3 >> draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse >> >> The draft is available here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/ >> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. *Speak Up* >> if you have strong opposition to this work. >> >> *More Importantly* >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. >> We will want several dedicated reviewers on this. >> >> I'm going to make this a short call for adoption, as we've discussed this >> in a few meetings. >> >> This call for adoption ends 17 April 2016. >> >> Thanks, >> tim wicinski >> DNSOP co-chair >> >> I support adoption. Will read and review. Section 7.3 concerns me. If the range is expanded enough to be useful, would it then allow zone enumeration?
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
