On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:18 AM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was discussed in Buenos Aires Friday morning, but the sense we > received from the room is that the group should move forward with this > draft. While we like the simplicity of Warren and Geoff's cheese-shop > draft (draft-wkumari-dnsop-cheese-shop), it is basically a simple > proof-of-concept. The suggestion was to document the cheese-shop idea > in this draft. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3 > draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse > > The draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. *Speak > Up* if you have strong opposition to this work. > *More Importantly* > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > We will want several dedicated reviewers on this. > I (obviously) support adoption. cheese-shop was simply a limited use case of this document to get us some of the benefits of this *soon*. It was never intended to be a competitor to this, rather a proof of concept in a zone with known attributes. Getting nsec-aggressiveuse out the door is the right thing to do... I'm happy to author, contribute text, review, cheerlead, track issues, stare pensively into space, whatever is helpful. > > I'm going to make this a short call for adoption, as we've discussed > this in a few meetings. > > This call for adoption ends 17 April 2016. > > Doh. Well, regardless, I still support it. W > Thanks, > tim wicinski > DNSOP co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
