No objection from the AS112 operators was received. Now, what do you
think of this draft? Should we continue or is it a bad idea (or a good
one, but hopeless?)
--- Begin Message ---
A new version of I-D, draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Stephane Bortzmeyer and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root
Revision: 02
Title: Using DNAME in the DNS root zone for sinking of special-use TLDs
Document date: 2016-04-29
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 7
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-02.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root/
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-02
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-02
Abstract:
This documents asks IANA to add DNAME records in the DNS root zone
for TLDs which are in the Special-Use Domain Names registry, in order
to ensure they receive an appropriate reply (NXDOMAIN) and that the
root nameservers are not too bothered by them.
REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION: there is no obvious place to discuss this
document. May be the IETF DNSOP (DNS Operations) group, through its
mailing list (the author reads it). Or may AS112 operators mailing
lists? The source of the document, as well as a list of open issues,
is currently kept at Github [1].
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
