Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Agree with Terry's DISCUSS. - Sec. 2: The last paragraph here isn't really about "goals" and seems like it belongs more appropriately in Sec 3. - Sec 6.1: I thought recently gathered data has been pointing to the futility of popping up security warnings (e.g., http://neurosecurity.byu.edu/media/Anderson_et_al._CHI_2015.pdf). Does it really make sense to recommend warning users in a BCP? What are users expected to do as a result? Is there any evidence about the proportion of users who even know what DNSSEC is? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
