"Alexey Melnikov" <[email protected]> writes: > I think this is a useful document, but it is not entirely clear to me how > well content of this document will age with time.
That's the problem with any BCP, certainly. But point taken. We can make it historic when the ubiquitous deployment of DNSSEC has been achieved :-) > Should spit-view be split-view? Fixed in the current document. > On page 14: > For a stub resolver, problems with the name server MAY manifest > themselves as the following types of error conditions: > > This is not an implementation choice, so use of MAY is not appropriate. > Change to "can" or the like. Good catch. Fixed. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
