On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:01 AM, John Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > A couple of nits > > EXTRA is spelt in at least 3 different ways.
Yup. English is an evolving language -- it was just evolving faster in this doc than elsewhere :-) Fixed in Github version (to be posted once the draft cutoff opens): https://github.com/wkumari/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses > The example in 5.1 introduces the AAA RR type without definition :) > Gah, I thought I could slide that though, and not have to write a whole new draft. Fixed... > Section 2 paragraph 1: I think that more recent examples of the background > regarding trust of additional records could be found. Yes, so would I / we -- however, we spent some time looking (specifically on the "why not to trust additional") and were not able to find any. Any pointers much appreciated. > IMHO section 8 item 2 should be removed as it is tending towards saying how > item 3 should be implemented. Fair 'nuff. Done, and updated in Github. Thank you for your comments. See you in Berlin? W > > regards > John > > > John Dickinson > > http://sinodun.com > > Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. > Magdalen Centre > Oxford Science Park > Robert Robinson Avenue > Oxford OX4 4GA > U.K. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
