RFC 7766 is about DNS/TCP not about DNS/HTTP, the order of processing has to be determined by the wrapping protocol. You would get it for free if this draft was about TCP over HTTP or HTTP over DNS/TCP, but it's not.
Marek On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:32 PM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >>> Don't you get this automatically if it's treated as a TCP DNS >>> connection? You stuff a bunch of requests down the pipe, and you get >>> back a bunch of responses. >>> See RFC 7766. > > >> You get queueing for free, but not pipelining and out-of-order >> responses, that has to be defined. > > > RFC 7766 says you should get pipelining and out-of-order responses on TCP > DNS. Take a look. > > Even if the underlying DNS server that the proxy is using can't do it, any > newly written proxy should provide TCP DNS the way 7766 says it should. > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
