On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Wessels, Duane" <[email protected]> writes: > > >> RRSIG Signature Validity 10 days > > > > Here I think you probably want to say DNSKEY RRSIG signature validity, > > because thats the only RRset whose validity period matters, right? > > Very good point. Changed for our next publication. > > >> Zone Maintainer The owner of a zone intending to publish a new Key- > >> Signing-Keys (KSKs) that will become a trust anchor by validators > >> following the RFC5011 process. > > > > Could I convince you to use another term? Maybe just Zone Owner? I > > worry that when people read Zone Maintainer they would subconsciously > > put "Root" in front of it and your abstract notes that this isn't > > really a concern for (current) root zone plans. > > Sure. Though there is always an issue with coming up with terms to > describe who controls various bits of a zone these days. It's not the > content owner, as that's often separated from the security dude that > signs the content (as you well know). We need a suitable term for that > role generally. I particularly like a suggestion by thesaurus.com, and > sadly it's actually the better of many of the choices: "zone right-hand > person". > > Any other suggestions? > -- > Wes Hardaker > Parsons > > > "zone signer" for that role? Some typos: 1. Introduction "indented" should be "intended" 5. Denial of Service Attack Considerations "validataor" should be "validator" -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
