> On Sep 21, 2016, at 8:31 PM, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote:
> On the other hand, the longer documents goes further in recognizing
> name processes are really inherently tied to ICANN process more than
> technical merit arguments. This pleases me, because I feel drawn to
> the view the problems are best expressed as "this is done by somebody
> else, in another equity process"
This is an interesting observation, as one of the comments we have received
many times about the first revisions of draft-adpkja was that the references to
ICANN were not helping. We even took heat for mentioning 2860...
I guess this reflects on the multitude of diverging opinions on the subject.
DNSOP mailing list