The problem is that you are doing the same thing I was just talking about: looking at the things you care about, and leaving out everything else.
It's possible that there simply isn't energy to do this work, in which case we definitely shouldn't do it. But what we are trying to do with our document was to try to break us outside the box of just looking at this from our various individual perspectives, and instead look at it from the broader perspective of as complete a set as possible of the people who have reason to care about this issue. I still think this work is worth doing, but I will agree with you that it does not appear that there are a lot of people on the mailing list who have any enthusiasm for doing it. If we were to do it, I really don't see the point in being parsimonious in our descriptions of the proiblems. We should be as concise as possible, of course, but no more concise than that. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
