I would encourage you to write up some terminal state, either for publication as an informational or in some other document series. People find stuff, and if you link to it in the mail archives, it will be a useful reminder of where we got to on the conversation.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >>>> No. They slow the leaks. They do not STOP the leaks. They depend on >>>> leaks to work. >>> >>> >>> With a 24 hour TTL on the root zone, it ain't going to leak very much. >> >> >> The practical TTL is 3 hours. > > > How come? This is a real question, unbound appears to believe the 24 hour > TTL. > >> But dummy stub zones (which is what is being I'm requesting) require >> changes in the root zone to add a insecure delegation to not break >> other things. That requires IANA to be instructed to do so. > > > Hm, I see your point. > > R's, > John > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop