Did you consider columnar storage formats like Apache Parquet + Snappy compression? It would be an interesting to compare this to cbor-dns.
https://parquet.apache.org/ https://github.com/google/snappy > Op 15 nov. 2016, om 07:18 heeft Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 14:59, George Michaelson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Terry clarified, the 30% size compression is not from uncompressed, >> but is the comparision with compressed gzip pcap. >> >> So, compressed DNS-CBOR is *significantly* smaller than pcap.gz > > Yup - sorry if I wasn’t clear in the presentation. With a general purpose > compression tool like xz: > > - Compressed C-DNS is around 30% the size of the compressed PCAP. > > - It requires around an order of magnitude less CPU to compress the C-DNS > file. > > Sara. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
