On 11/16/16 10:19 PM, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:


On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    ~~~

    There's a small procedural thing - the last name of the draft
    appears on both datatracker.i.o and tools.i.o.  I believe it
    would be better to reupload the draft with name changed to

    draft-ietf-dnsop-minimal-any

    to prevent the people who might thing the name of the draft
    bears any significance.  As this requires almost no effort
    I think it would be better to this now than fend of the
    questions "why is this refuse-any while it doesn't refuse
    ANY" later.


I in principle support this but this has to be the chairs call

Olafur



That's an interesting observation.  I would support that in principle also.

I'll put that question into the WGLC last call statement

tim

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to