Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - intro: References for directions that fail "disastrously" would be good, if only to decrease the chances that other implementers choose known-bad approaches. - section 5, 2nd para: such an attacker can also see what queries are being emitted by the resolver, and, in the absence of qname minimisation, that can be quite privacy sensitive. I think it'd be well worth noting that with a reference to RFC7816 as a possible mitigation. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
