The authors think that they have captured / addressed everyone's comments - if we missed (or misunderstood) anything, it was unintentional. W
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, 2:13 PM tjw ietf <[email protected]> wrote: > All > > The process of WGLC for this document engaged the working group and there > was much discussion and several different versions. It seems that the > authors have addressed everything that has been brought up. > > We felt another formal Working Group Last call was needed, though > hopefully shorter. > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: > "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3" > draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/ > > For those looking for the differences, these are the differences between > the document submitted, and the current one: > > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-02&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-03 > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone > feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with > your reasons. > > > This starts a *one* week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at > midnight 20 December 2016 UTC. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
