Ray Bellis writes:
> On 14/12/2016 20:14, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> > Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something
> > like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa).
>
> <hat partly-on>
Which hat?
>
> It's not considered user-friendly enough.
>
> The historic meaning of ARPA is considered by some to be problematic in
> the consumer space that Homenet is targeting.
>
> It's unfortunate that it's the only top-level name under IAB control.
> The current expansion of the acronym to "Address and Routing Parameter
> Area" is itself not a good fit for this somewhat more generic use case.
But is there a technical argument? Or is this just a well a believe
it doesn't fit perfectly. Does it really matter how the identifier
is called?
jaap
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
