SMTP configuration is not relevant... That said, the morphing of open SMTP services to the tightly controlled heirarchy and draconian locally administered rules which prevent delivery are EXACTLY what this draft proposes for the DNS.
On Sunday, 18 December 2016, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim is correct, this is not relevant > > tim > > > On 12/18/16 7:37 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > >> >> On 18 Dec 2016, at 12:28, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> You're saying that most spam messages contain a Message-ID header. >>> >> >> Please take this discussion somewhere else. It is not appropriate for >> dnsop. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
