Thanks Paul, and double thanks to Matthijs for his diligence in wisely forcing this.
The new version is minor, but significant. I don't feel that it needs a new WGLC, but I want to put the diff between the two versions here so folks may take a second look. https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-maintai n-ds-06.txt&url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-04.txt I'm going back over all the emails I have during the IETF LC process, just to make sure everything has been addressed. However, I think it's ready to move forward thanks tim On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Ohh, I think Matthijs actually found a bug: >> > > Fixed in 06 (I forgot the text update in 05). Thanks to Matthijs > for being so persistent in bringing this up. My apologies that > I did not understand your concern before. > > Chairs, it is up to you to decide on redoing a LC on this or not. > > The diff between 04 and 06 that contains all changes since IETF LC: > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-maintai > n-ds-06.txt&url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-04.txt > > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
