On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:40 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's an interesting observation.  RFC 6761 imported the RFC 1918 zones from 
> RFC 6303 section 4.1, but not the other zones from sections 4.2 through 4.6.  
> Was that deliberate of an oversight?

RFC 6761 doesn't actually reference RFC6303.   I suspect that this was indeed 
an oversight, although it can also be argued that there is no special need to 
list these zones in the special-use names registry.

But this inconsistency is certainly worthy of note.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to