On Thursday, 23 February 2017 13:58:18 GMT Bob Harold wrote: > Is it possible to have a case where the software does not know if > promiscuous mode was enabled ? If so, we should allow for an "unspecified" > or "unknown" code for "promisc" > > Perhaps a pcap to C-DNS converter would have this issue, if the pcap format > does not include "promisc" info?
Thanks, that's a good point. Yes, it is certainly possible to not have a known promiscuous mode, and also of course in the case of a pcap conversion the interface is not known. We're discussing the best approach to handling this; whether to have specified 'unspecified' values, or specify that, since all config items in C-DNS are optional, values should only be present if definitely known. -- Jim Hague [email protected] Never trust a computer you can't lift. Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. +44 7941 697732 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
