On Mar 12, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: > Was name allocation part really 10x more than the rest of > the protocol development? I was not paying much > attention to the topic at the time, but I thought there > also other issues.
Yes, it really was. I was a participant in that process, so I know what you're referring to, but if you review the timeline in the IETF proceedings (and I did) the numbers are quite stark. The reason we mentioned this and not .onion is that we're talking about the impression people have outside of the IETF. The point isn't to criticize the process, but to show how it is perceived. Do you think we should add text to make that intention more clear? Thanks for the review!
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
