Thank you for the draft. I have to say that from my perspective the draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update selected a better approach to the problem. IMHO it is important to distinguish consumers and producers of signatures as discussed in the original thread.
While I agree that draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update requires substantial editorial changes the spirit seems to be correct to me so I would rather advance draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update instead of this new draft. Sorry for being mean! Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC On 14.3.2017 09:04, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative to > draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update. > > jakob > > > Forwarded message: > >> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org >> To: Roy Arends <roy.are...@icann.org>, Jakob Schlyter >> <ja...@kirei.se>, Matt Larson <matt.lar...@icann.org> >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00.txt >> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:47:24 -0700 >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Roy Arends and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update >> Revision: 00 >> Title: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry >> Updates >> Document date: 2017-03-12 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 6 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00.txt >> >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update/ >> >> Htmlized: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00 >> >> >> Abstract: >> The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) require the use of cryptographic >> algorithm suites for generating digital signatures and cryptographic >> hashes over DNS data. The algorithms specified for use with DNSSEC >> are reflected in IANA registries. This document updates some entries >> in these registries. The main reason for these updates is to retire >> the use of SHA1. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop