Dave Crocker wrote: > On 3/28/2017 12:46 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: >> i don't think it's wise to estimate damage by observed complain level. >> if _ is now in world wide use for all kinds of stuff, you can still say >> that SRV got it wrong, and that the recommended way to do this kind of >> thing is different from what SRV did. you could also do what a lot of >> operating system developers had to do about _ use with C, which is use >> two underscores in the next design, whose use will be better policed. > > > Hmmm. So, I missed that you were targeting the narrower issue of SRV, > per se, rather than the broader (and shallower) task of attrleaf.
no, i wasn't. i'd like any new SRV-like protocol to learn from SRV's mistakes rather than following in SRV's footsteps. i don't propose to alter where new SRV protocols/services should have their rendezvous'. -- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
