Thanks for the review and helpful comments, Benoit. Ted, Warren - I'm login to be tied up with some family stuff through the weekend. If none of us get to it, I can process Benoit's comments Monday.
- Ralph > On May 30, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear authors, > > Here is my AD review. > > > - > This section presents a list of problems that have been identified > with respect to the assignment of Special-Use Domain Names. > Solutions to these problems, including their costs or tradeoffs, are > out of scope for this document. > > There is a broad diversity of opinion about this set of problems. > Not every participant agrees that each of the problems enumerated in > this document is actually a problem. This document takes no position > on the relative validity of the various problems that have been > enumerated. Its focused purposes are to enumerate those problems, > provide the reader with context for thinking about them and provide a > context for future discussion of solutions. > > So you want to write something such as ... regardless of whether the > problems are valid ones AND regardless of the ownership (IETF, IANA, ICANN, > or ...) > And it seems that you didn't try to categorize the problems per ownership > (this is an IETF or ICANN problem, as an example). > I guess that this is the way you approached this document, right? You should > document this. > > - > gTLD Generic Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC > 7719 [RFC7719] > > gTLD is not strictly defined in RFC7719, only TLD > > - correct the .home section in 4.2.7, which is solved with Errata ID: 4677 > > > MINOR > - > [SDO-ICANN-DAG] > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "Special-Use Domain > Names registry", October 2015, > <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook- > <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-04jun12-en.pdf> > full-04jun12-en.pdf > <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-04jun12-en.pdf>> > > Don't you have a more up to date reference (2012)? > First page of this document is: "Currently the namespace consists of 22 gTLDs > and over 250 ccTLDs operating on various models." > - > o There are several Domain Name TLDs that are in use without due > process for a variety of purposes [SDO-ICANN-COLL > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#ref-SDO-ICANN-COLL>]. > The status of > these names need to be clarified and recorded to avoid future > disputes about their use. > > I don't understand the sentence "There are several Domain Name TLDs that are > in use without due > process for a variety of purposes", with a reference that speaks about > "Name Collision in the DNS". > > > EDITORIAL: > - "in in". Two occurences in > TLD Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC 7719 > [RFC7719] > gTLD Generic Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC > 7719 [RFC7719] > > - OLD: > Special-Use Domain Name A Domain Name listed in the Special-Use > Domain Names registry. > NEW: > Special-Use Domain Name A Domain Name listed in the Special-Use > Domain Names registry [SDO-IANA-SUDR]. > > - OLD: > The history of RFC 6762 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762> is > documented in substantial detail in > Appendix H > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#appendix-H> > > NEW: > The history of RFC 6762 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762> is > documented in substantial detail in > Appendix H of RFC 6762 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#appendix-H> > > - Expand SSAC on the first occurrence. > > Regards, Benoit >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
