Hi,
Hi, Ted,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just
to point this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be
correct. It is claimed to be the list of problems that people
have asserted exist. I do not agree that all the problems listed
are problems, nor I think does anyone else. If that's not clear
in the document, that's probably worth correcting.
I think my comments are more likely to be unclear than the way the
document describes the problem set. What you said, is what I think the
document says.
I'm mostly sending comments about specific points that the document
makes, that I think I understand at a surface level, but I don't think
I understand the implications in a few cases, so, that's what I
included in my ballot.
I think the document is clear enough on "claimed to be the list of
problems that people have asserted exist", and even if I didn't think
that was a fine basis for this document, I wouldn't dream of
suggesting that the authors change the criteria for what's included.
Part of my AD review, I asked the text to clarified. Hopefully, it's
clarified.
From the 04 to 05 diff:
Regards, B.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
