Jinmei writes:
> In this suggested text I've made two unrelated changes:
> 
> - s/, where a hostname changed/when a hostname changed/
>   sine the original phrase was a bit confusing to me (it could read as
>   if it talked about something about the BIND implementation, but it's
>   actually talking about in which case the problem happens).
> - fixing typo: s/record.to/record to/
>   You'll at least need to fix this one even if the other part of the
>   suggestion is rejected.

Both done in the pending draft, which I hope to post after a call for
adoption.  (I'd caught the latter right after submitting.  Isn't that
the way it always is?)

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to