Okay, sorry, that wasn't really clear. Possible reading comprehension problem on my part. :]
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > If the WG still gets to freely edit the document while adhering to > "describes an existing and widely deployed method", this seems like a good > way forwards. > > --Paul Hoffman > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
