>From a W3C perspective, and for the further specification of components of the web security model, it would be helpful to have this behavior of the loopback interface specified.
I support adoption and will be willing to review text. Thanks, --Wendy On 09/06/2017 10:00 AM, tjw ietf wrote: > When the idea of having a Call for Adoption for this document came up, we > thought long and hard about this one. However, the comments from the > working group focused this document to address the specific issue of the > local hostname. > > This starts a formal Call for Adoption for > draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 20 September 2017 > > Thanks, > tim wicinski > DNSOP co-chair -- Wendy Seltzer -- [email protected] +1.617.715.4883 (office) Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
