Greetings again. One of the last major large issues for
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis is to re-look at issues that were
brought up in the preparation of RFC 7719 but were deferred to the -bis
document. I have recently discovered that us doing that deferral pissed
off some folks pretty heavily, and for that I apologize. I hope that
people on this list are still willing to engage on the last bits of this
document so that we can finish it in the near term.
To that end, I have opened up four issues in the GitHub tracker for
things that I found we had deferred but not dealt with:
https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/32:
superordinate and subordinate
https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/33:
Four new terms about queries
https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/34:
Split out error names in their own terms
https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/35:
Clarifying "referral"
Please comment here on the list or in GitHub if you have any opinion
about them. Personally, I believe all should be acted on.
Also, if you have the stomach for it, please review the entire
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis (yet?) again and see if there are
issues you remember from before that weren't brought up, or new issues
that should be brought up now. This time, there is clearly no rush like
there was before, and it would be good to get it more right this time.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
