On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote a message of 176 lines which said:
> Now that I've attempted to compose this reply, it seems to me, and > perhaps was obvious to other readers more quickly because they're at > 20kft and not 1ft on this, that your real point is that the document > should not privilege ICANN over OpenNIC. If so, you should say > that directly Please do not tell me what is my real point. I know my real point (even if it is not always expressed clearly). When it comes to non-technical issue, the draft says, when defining TLD, that "the division [between ccTLD and gTLD] is a matter of policy, and beyond the scope of this document." This is the right approach. The fact that the root is managed by ICANN or OpenNIC or whatever is beyond the scope of this document. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
