On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:02:47PM +0000, John Levine wrote: > > I see a message on dnsop from you proposing a bunch of things > including "rationalizing" names, and comments from Andrew and Peter > saying they like that approach.
I think, to be clear, what I was saying I liked was the document splitting. This is because I sent Dave feedback on his original approach back a decade or so ago, worried about how the registry won't really be possible because of the multiple levels and so on. The basic problem is that underscore labels are a mess and needed a registry to begin with. > A good way to rationalize them would be to document the the rules in > one place with pointers to the relevant registries. I would be willing to review additional proposals (including that one) for how to make this whole thing less of a disaster, yes. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
