On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > there's code that implements this. there are people using it. there will be > more of both. a standard will mean greater interoperability.
Why was the code written? Why are they using this? What is it about this solution that makes it preferable, for their use case, to a smart proxy that is itself a full-service resolver and thus shouldn't tunnel information about the query transport? Given Bert's talk on camels, I think these are questions that are worth asking, and the answer shouldn't be "because."
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
