Thanks Job for keeping *me* straight. Tim
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Job Snijders <j...@ntt.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > While the chair notes awareness of the point I raised, I’d like the be > explicit to avoid any confusion. > > This document is *not* ready for publication. There is no implementation > report available for review and consideration. > > Should the working group produce an implementation report and demonstrate > multiple implementations before April 15th, I’d ofcourse be willing to > reconsider my position. > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 18:36, tjw ietf <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> After walking through the 168 emails on this draft in the inbox, I feel >> we're ready to take this to WGLC. >> >> (We are aware of the two points raised my Job and Paul) >> >> >> This starts a Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll- >> sentinel >> >> Current versions of the draft is available here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel/ >> >> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed Standard >> >> In the brushing of the camel, the draft is focused on determining if >> a particular root key has been loaded into resolvers. >> >> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. >> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. >> if someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please >> speak out with your reasons. >> >> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: >> 23:59 19 April 2018 >> >> thanks >> tim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
