Just discovered it lacks RFCs 4035 and 5702 as well. So it's definitely on the conservative side.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:38 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Nick Johnson wrote: > > > No, I left out RFCs only referenced by "obsoletes" metadata. > > Okay, then the photo is accurate :) > > Paul >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
