Following on from my previous comment in a will surely make no sense in the archives unless you're ordering by date instead of by thread,
On 4 May 2018, at 08:37, Edward Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't about terminology but the once-again debate about a registry's > responsibility here. > > It's simple to state a policy that says: > > If an registered NS record does not function properly, .... from the perspective of whom? There's issue 6 for you. Joe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
