On 6/28/2018 12:02 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 28 Jun 2018, at 7:19, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 6/27/2018 3:01 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Due to its nature, the document is a bit difficult to read, but I
don't have any suggestion about how to make it better.
Could you at least provide some description of what it is that you
find difficult?
It feels like it loops into itself, where 3.1 and 3.2 sound like, but
are different than, 2.2 and 2.3. I've stared it, and I don't see a way
to make it better without making 2.2 and 2.3 more convoluted. It's not
worth worrying about more unless someone else comes up with a
simplification that is actually simpler.
Hmmm. I did find some small-but-irritating disparities in parallel
texts that should have been identical other than in naming the RR or
other actual differences.
But I suspect you are reacting to something else.
Section 2 is about the specific, instance documents while Section 3 is
about the 'meta' documents. These two sections need to have some
similarities quite important differences, I think.
Anyhow, I'm not seeing any significant changes more any obvious need for
them, absent something figuring out the deeper issue you are reacting to.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
